Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?

[Avi Kivity]

On 01/25/2012 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > 
> >> Would a machine option
> >> "kvm_shadow_memory=n" be desirable?
> > 
> > Not sure, this is a host option, not a guest option.  Machine options
> > should be guest-visible.
>
> machine options are not guest visible. Basically, this options falls
> into the same category as kernel_irqchip.

They should be.  We should work hard to separate the guest ABI from
everything else.  Same as kvm-apic appearing in the qdev name.

> Do we have alternatives? A top-level command line options is surely none.

  -kvm shadow-memory=n,...

  -accel kvm,shadow-memory=n,...

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function