[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] licensing of IBM contributions to QEMU (was Re: [PULL v
From: |
Anthony Liguori |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] licensing of IBM contributions to QEMU (was Re: [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic) |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:35:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.15.2+77~g661dcf8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
>> > >>>I'm guessing you need approval from Jiuxing Liu for this,
>> > >>>pls make him ack license change.
>> > >>He approves. He doesn't work for IBM anymore.
>> > >Does he approve version 2 or version 2 or later?
>> > >
>> >
>> > It doesn't matter - his contributions were made at IBM and he
>> > doesn't work for IBM anymore.
>>
>> It's considered polite not to ignore author's wishes wrt licensing.
>> It's best to contact and get the ack if possible. If not, please tell
>> the list and we'll consider the options.
>
> There are three cases:
>
> - relicensing to something less restrictive, employer agrees on more
> liberal license, employee doesn't. The employer's choice wins. There
> are certainly RH employees that would prefer v2 and no later version,
> but we are still releasing all RH changes as GPLv2+.
>
> - relicensing to something less restrictive, no employer (or employer
> lets the employee choose the license). Here you *must* contact the
> employee.
>
> - relicensing to something compatible but more restrictive (e.g.
> BSD -> GPL). No legal obligation to contact the author (his contributions
> would still be available on the older license, all you get by contacting
> the author is that you can remove the BSD terms from the file), but it
> is indeed more polite to do so.
>
>
> I'm pretty sure that IBM cares about licensing, but I don't know what
> their global policy is. Surely they didn't do a full grant of their
> contributions to GPLv2+ (which RH and a bunch of other people did),
> but if _new_ IBM contributions are to be GPLv2+, there is no need to
> contact Jiuxing Liu. Anthony?
Guys, we'll fixup the copyright in the next round of patches. I can't
talk publicly about our internal policies around copyright assignment
and licensing or else I would.
Just ignore the copyrights in this series as they are bogus for all
intents and purposes.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael R. Hines, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael R. Hines, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael R. Hines, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Anthony Liguori, 2013/04/18
- [Qemu-devel] licensing of IBM contributions to QEMU (was Re: [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic), Paolo Bonzini, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] licensing of IBM contributions to QEMU (was Re: [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic), Michael R. Hines, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] licensing of IBM contributions to QEMU (was Re: [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic),
Anthony Liguori <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 08/11] rdma: core logic, Eric Blake, 2013/04/18
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 00/11] rdma: migration support, Anthony Liguori, 2013/04/17
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v4 00/11] rdma: migration support, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/04/18