qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/11] add "test-int128" and "test-bitops" to .gi


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 08/11] add "test-int128" and "test-bitops" to .gitignore
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:57:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130806 Thunderbird/17.0.8

On 08/20/13 21:16, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.08.2013 20:39, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:23:00 +0200
>> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Am 20.08.2013 18:10, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
>>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
>>>> index 0fe114d..a8e0f17 100644
>>>> --- a/.gitignore
>>>> +++ b/.gitignore
>>>> @@ -45,7 +45,9 @@ qemu-bridge-helper
>>>>  qemu-monitor.texi
>>>>  vscclient
>>>>  QMP/qmp-commands.txt
>>>> +test-bitops
>>>>  test-coroutine
>>>> +test-int128
>>>>  test-qmp-input-visitor
>>>>  test-qmp-output-visitor
>>>>  test-string-input-visitor
>>>
>>> Markus' patch earlier today added the same two entries to
>>> tests/.gitignore instead, which seems to have more test-* entries.
>>>
>>> Should we consolidate these two files by moving the above test-* into
>>> tests/.gitignore, or do we need to mirror everything into both files for
>>> some reason?
>>
>> I think we could consolidate everything in tests/.gitignore. But can we
>> do it as an incremental patch? It's a very small cosmetic thing to respin
>> the series and my pull request.
> 
> Sure, it's not a bug.

Is it OK if I submit a patch moving the test-* entries over to
tests/.gitignore once Anthony applies this? (I'm offering because it's
not clear to me who's planning to do it.)

Thanks
Laszlo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]