[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn
From: |
Edgar E. Iglesias |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:55:21 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 07:47:16PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 September 2014 05:29, Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > target-arm/cpu.h | 1 +
> > target-arm/helper-a64.c | 1 +
> > target-arm/helper.c | 6 ++++++
> > target-arm/helper.h | 1 +
> > target-arm/internals.h | 6 ++++++
> > target-arm/op_helper.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > target-arm/translate-a64.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 7 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.h b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > index b553f3d..c24af40 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> > #define EXCP_KERNEL_TRAP 9 /* Jumped to kernel code page. */
> > #define EXCP_STREX 10
> > #define EXCP_HVC 11 /* HyperVisor Call */
> > +#define EXCP_SMC 12 /* Secure Monitor Call */
> >
> > #define ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET 1
> > #define ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI 2
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper-a64.c b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> > index 4e6ca26..996dfea 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper-a64.c
> > @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ void aarch64_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> > case EXCP_UDEF:
> > case EXCP_SWI:
> > case EXCP_HVC:
> > + case EXCP_SMC:
> > env->cp15.esr_el[new_el] = env->exception.syndrome;
> > break;
> > case EXCP_IRQ:
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> > index 504ff42..719c95d 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> > @@ -3677,6 +3677,12 @@ unsigned int arm_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs,
> > unsigned int excp_idx)
> > case EXCP_HVC:
> > target_el = MAX(target_el, 2);
> > break;
> > + case EXCP_SMC:
> > + target_el = 3;
> > + if (!secure && cur_el == 1 && (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_TSC)) {
> > + target_el = 2;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > }
> > return target_el;
> > }
> > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.h b/target-arm/helper.h
> > index 75fc1b3..dec3728 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/helper.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/helper.h
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_3(exception_with_syndrome, void, env, i32, i32)
> > DEF_HELPER_1(wfi, void, env)
> > DEF_HELPER_1(wfe, void, env)
> > DEF_HELPER_1(pre_hvc, void, env)
> > +DEF_HELPER_2(pre_smc, void, env, i32)
> >
> > DEF_HELPER_3(cpsr_write, void, env, i32, i32)
> > DEF_HELPER_1(cpsr_read, i32, env)
> > diff --git a/target-arm/internals.h b/target-arm/internals.h
> > index afcc4e0..e15ae57 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/internals.h
> > +++ b/target-arm/internals.h
> > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static const char * const excnames[] = {
> > [EXCP_KERNEL_TRAP] = "QEMU intercept of kernel commpage",
> > [EXCP_STREX] = "QEMU intercept of STREX",
> > [EXCP_HVC] = "Hypervisor Call",
> > + [EXCP_SMC] = "Secure Monitor Call",
> > };
> >
> > static inline void arm_log_exception(int idx)
> > @@ -221,6 +222,11 @@ static inline uint32_t syn_aa64_hvc(uint32_t imm16)
> > return (EC_AA64_HVC << ARM_EL_EC_SHIFT) | ARM_EL_IL | (imm16 & 0xffff);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline uint32_t syn_aa64_smc(uint32_t imm16)
> > +{
> > + return (EC_AA64_SMC << ARM_EL_EC_SHIFT) | ARM_EL_IL | (imm16 & 0xffff);
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline uint32_t syn_aa32_svc(uint32_t imm16, bool is_thumb)
> > {
> > return (EC_AA32_SVC << ARM_EL_EC_SHIFT) | (imm16 & 0xffff)
> > diff --git a/target-arm/op_helper.c b/target-arm/op_helper.c
> > index 8441c27..e6a0656 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/op_helper.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/op_helper.c
> > @@ -406,6 +406,32 @@ void HELPER(pre_hvc)(CPUARMState *env)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +void HELPER(pre_smc)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t syndrome)
> > +{
> > + int cur_el = arm_current_pl(env);
> > + /* FIXME: Use real secure state. */
> > + bool secure = false;
> > + bool smd = env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_SMD;
> > + /* On ARMv8 AArch32, SMD only applies to NS mode.
> > + * On ARMv7 SMD only applies to NS mode and only if EL2 is available.
> > + * For ARMv7 non EL2, we force SMD to zero so we don't need to re-check
> > + * the EL2 condition here.
> > + */
>
> NS isn't a mode, it's a state. (S vs NS state is orthogonal
> to exception levels and mostly orthogonal to AArch32 modes.)
>
> > + bool udef = is_a64(env) ? smd : !secure && smd;
>
> What precedence did you intend here between the ?: and
> the && operators? More brackets would be nice...
Will change it to:
is_a64(env) ? smd : (!secure && smd);
>
> > + /* In NS EL1, HCR controlled routing to EL2 has priority over SMD. */
> > + if (!secure && cur_el == 1 && (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_TSC)) {
> > + env->exception.syndrome = syndrome;
> > + raise_exception(env, EXCP_SMC);
>
> Shouldn't this just be returning so that the generated
> code immediately following can raise the SMC exception
> with the correct syndrome, PC and singlestep state?
> (would also save you passing in the syndrome argument
> to this fn).
When routing SMCs to EL2, the exception happens before advancing the
PC. It's similar to the undef cases for HVC (and SMC).
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* We've already checked that EL3 exists at translation time. */
> > + if (udef) {
> > + env->exception.syndrome = syn_uncategorized();
> > + raise_exception(env, EXCP_UDEF);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > void HELPER(exception_return)(CPUARMState *env)
> > {
> > int cur_el = arm_current_pl(env);
> > diff --git a/target-arm/translate-a64.c b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> > index 8eaa85f..9a58de8 100644
> > --- a/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> > +++ b/target-arm/translate-a64.c
> > @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ static void disas_exc(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
> > int opc = extract32(insn, 21, 3);
> > int op2_ll = extract32(insn, 0, 5);
> > int imm16 = extract32(insn, 5, 16);
> > + TCGv_i32 tmp;
> >
> > switch (opc) {
> > case 0:
> > @@ -1495,6 +1496,18 @@ static void disas_exc(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
> > gen_ss_advance(s);
> > gen_exception_insn(s, 0, EXCP_HVC, syn_aa64_hvc(imm16));
> > break;
> > + case 3:
> > + if (!arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) || s->current_pl == 0)
> > {
> > + unallocated_encoding(s);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + gen_a64_set_pc_im(s->pc - 4);
> > + tmp = tcg_const_i32(syn_aa64_smc(imm16));
> > + gen_helper_pre_smc(cpu_env, tmp);
> > + tcg_temp_free_i32(tmp);
> > + gen_ss_advance(s);
> > + gen_exception_insn(s, 0, EXCP_SMC, syn_aa64_smc(imm16));
> > + break;
> > default:
> > unallocated_encoding(s);
> > break;
> > --
> > 1.9.1
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 07/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the HVC insn, (continued)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2014/09/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Greg Bellows, 2014/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Peter Maydell, 2014/09/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn,
Edgar E. Iglesias <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Peter Maydell, 2014/09/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2014/09/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Peter Maydell, 2014/09/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2014/09/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/10] target-arm: A64: Emulate the SMC insn, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2014/09/26
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 09/10] target-arm: Add IRQ and FIQ routing to EL2 and 3, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2014/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 10/10] target-arm: Add support for VIRQ and VFIQ, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2014/09/13