[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layou
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:52:51 +0200 |
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:27:36 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> > > > {
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> > > > + * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set up.
> > >
> > > Where does it say that?
> >
> > Hmpf, may have imagined that.
> >
> > This means we either need to track whether used/avail have been
> > specified or calculated or move responsibility for re-calculation of
> > used/avail for the old layout into the callers.
>
> What about this one instead?
Looks ok overall - some questions below.
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> index 43b7e02..1e2a720 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> @@ -244,9 +244,13 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
> offset, uint64_t value,
> case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM:
> DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value,
> VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE);
> virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
> + /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */
> + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
> break;
> case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN:
> + /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */
> virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
> + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
> break;
> case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN:
> if (value == 0) {
Let's just call virtio_queue_update_rings from virtio_queue_set_align?
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 8f69ffa..b2d553e 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ typedef struct VRing
> struct VirtQueue
> {
> VRing vring;
> - hwaddr pa;
> uint16_t last_avail_idx;
> /* Last used index value we have signalled on */
> uint16_t signalled_used;
> @@ -92,15 +91,18 @@ struct VirtQueue
> };
>
> /* virt queue functions */
> -static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq)
> +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> {
> - hwaddr pa = vq->pa;
> + VRing *vring = &vdev->vq[n].vring;
>
> - vq->vring.desc = pa;
> - vq->vring.avail = pa + vq->vring.num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
> - vq->vring.used = vring_align(vq->vring.avail +
> - offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vq->vring.num]),
> - vq->vring.align);
> + if (!vring->desc) {
> + /* not yet setup -> nothing to do */
> + return;
> + }
> + vring->avail = vring->desc + vring->num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
> + vring->used = vring_align(vring->avail +
> + offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vring->num]),
> + vring->align);
> }
>
> static inline uint64_t vring_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, hwaddr desc_pa,
> @@ -605,7 +607,6 @@ void virtio_reset(void *opaque)
> vdev->vq[i].vring.avail = 0;
> vdev->vq[i].vring.used = 0;
> vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx = 0;
> - vdev->vq[i].pa = 0;
> vdev->vq[i].vector = VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR;
> vdev->vq[i].signalled_used = 0;
> vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
> @@ -708,13 +709,21 @@ void virtio_config_writel(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint32_t
> addr, uint32_t data)
>
> void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr)
> {
> - vdev->vq[n].pa = addr;
> - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
> + vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = addr;
> + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n);
> }
>
> hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> {
> - return vdev->vq[n].pa;
> + return vdev->vq[n].vring.desc;
> +}
> +
> +void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
> + hwaddr avail, hwaddr used)
> +{
> + vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = desc;
> + vdev->vq[n].vring.avail = avail;
> + vdev->vq[n].vring.used = used;
> }
>
> void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> @@ -728,7 +737,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
> num)
> return;
> }
> vdev->vq[n].vring.num = num;
> - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
> }
>
> int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> @@ -748,6 +756,11 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> int align)
> BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev));
> VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
>
> + /* virtio-1 compliant devices cannot change the aligment */
> + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> + error_report("tried to modify queue alignment for virtio-1 device");
> + return;
> + }
> /* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this
> * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than
> * silently failing to migrate this state)
Do we have to touch this now?
It's only used by MMIO, right?
> @@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> int align)
> assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment);
>
> vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align;
> - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
Don't we need to update rings?
> }
>
> void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq)
> @@ -949,7 +961,8 @@ void virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f)
> if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
> qemu_put_be32(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.align);
> }
> - qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa);
> + /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
> + qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
> qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
> if (k->save_queue) {
> k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
> @@ -1044,13 +1057,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
> version_id)
> if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
> vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
> }
> - vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
> + vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f);
> qemu_get_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
> vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
> vdev->vq[i].notification = true;
>
> - if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
> - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[i]);
> + if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
> + /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
What does XXX mean here?
> + virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, i);
> } else if (vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx) {
> error_report("VQ %d address 0x0 "
> "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x",
> @@ -1084,7 +1098,7 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
> version_id)
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> - if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
> + if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
> uint16_t nheads;
> nheads = vring_avail_idx(&vdev->vq[i]) -
> vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
> /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers.
> */
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> index 68c40db..b63ced3 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
> hwaddr addr);
> hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num);
> int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> +void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
> + hwaddr avail, hwaddr used);
> +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align);
> void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 05/19] virtio: support more feature bits, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 05/19] virtio: support more feature bits, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 06/19] virtio: endianness checks for virtio 1.0 devices, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2014/12/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/03
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 08/19] dataplane: allow virtio-1 devices, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 09/19] s390x/css: Add a callback for when subchannel gets disabled, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 12/19] virtio: disallow late feature changes for virtio-1, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 11/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: support virtio-1 set_vq format, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v5 10/19] s390x/virtio-ccw: add virtio set-revision call, Cornelia Huck, 2014/12/02