[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] bitops.h: sextract64() return type should be int64_
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] bitops.h: sextract64() return type should be int64_t, not uint64_t |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:02:08 +0000 |
The documentation for sextract64() claims that the return type is
an int64_t, but the code itself disagrees. Fix the return type to
conform to the documentation and to bring it into line with
sextract32(), which returns int32_t.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
I quickly eyeballed all the callers and I don't think any of them
were relying on the unsignedness of the return type.
---
include/qemu/bitops.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/bitops.h b/include/qemu/bitops.h
index 181bd46..90ca8df 100644
--- a/include/qemu/bitops.h
+++ b/include/qemu/bitops.h
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static inline int32_t sextract32(uint32_t value, int start,
int length)
* Returns: the sign extended value of the bit field extracted from the
* input value.
*/
-static inline uint64_t sextract64(uint64_t value, int start, int length)
+static inline int64_t sextract64(uint64_t value, int start, int length)
{
assert(start >= 0 && length > 0 && length <= 64 - start);
/* Note that this implementation relies on right shift of signed
--
1.9.1
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] bitops.h: sextract64() return type should be int64_t, not uint64_t,
Peter Maydell <=