Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: memory API changes

[Peter Maydell]

On 24 March 2015 at 16:23, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 24 March 2015 at 15:08, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > On 24/03/2015 15:53, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >>> > In any case, the removal or segregation of ld/st*_phys should be a
>> >>> > separate series for ease of review.
>> >> Who wants to remove ld/st*_phys? Not me...
>> >
>> > Well, you want to rename them _and_ add new arguments.  Basically at the
>> > end they don't exist anymore as we know them now. :)
>>
>> I guess :-)  So what exactly would you like to see as a
>> separate series?
>
> Adding the arguments / renaming the functions

OK. (This will need the patch that actually at least defines
the MemTxAttr and MemTxResult types, obviously.)

>, for those callers
> of ld/st*_phys that use cs->as as the first argument.

...but I don't understand this caveat. I want to add arguments
and rename the functions for *all* callers of ld/st*_phys.
I don't want to specialcase the ones which happen to be
operating on cs->as.

-- PMM