Re: [Qemu-devel] Error handling in realize() methods

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 09/12/2015 10:30, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> My current working assumption is that passing &error_fatal to
> memory_region_init_ram() & friends is okay even in realize() methods and
> their supporting code, except when the allocation can be large.

I suspect a lot of memory_region_init_ram()s could be considered
potentially large (at least in the 16-64 megabytes range).  Propagation
of memory_region_init_ram() failures is easy enough, thanks to Error**,
that we should just do it.

Even if we don't, we should use &error_abort, not &error_fatal
(programmer error---due to laziness---rather than user error).
&error_fatal should really be restricted to code that is running very
close to main().

Paolo

> Even
> then, &error_fatal is better than buggy recovery code (which I can see
> all over the place, but that's a separate topic).