qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 09/16] softmmu: Include MMIO/invalid exclusive


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 09/16] softmmu: Include MMIO/invalid exclusive accesses
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:49:56 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.0.91.3

Alvise Rigo <address@hidden> writes:

> Enable exclusive accesses when the MMIO/invalid flag is set in the TLB
> entry.
>
> In case a LL access is done to MMIO memory, we treat it differently from
> a RAM access in that we do not rely on the EXCL bitmap to flag the page
> as exclusive. In fact, we don't even need the TLB_EXCL flag to force the
> slow path, since it is always forced anyway.
>
> This commit does not take care of invalidating an MMIO exclusive range from
> other non-exclusive accesses i.e. CPU1 LoadLink to MMIO address X and
> CPU2 writes to X. This will be addressed in the following commit.
>
> Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen <address@hidden>
> Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo <address@hidden>
> ---
>  cputlb.c           |  7 +++----
>  softmmu_template.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cputlb.c b/cputlb.c
> index aa9cc17..87d09c8 100644
> --- a/cputlb.c
> +++ b/cputlb.c
> @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong 
> vaddr,
>          if ((memory_region_is_ram(section->mr) && section->readonly)
>              || memory_region_is_romd(section->mr)) {
>              /* Write access calls the I/O callback.  */
> -            te->addr_write = address | TLB_MMIO;
> +            address |= TLB_MMIO;
>          } else if (memory_region_is_ram(section->mr)
>                     && cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(section->mr->ram_addr
>                                                     + xlat)) {
> @@ -437,11 +437,10 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, 
> target_ulong vaddr,
>              if (cpu_physical_memory_is_excl(section->mr->ram_addr + xlat)) {
>                  /* There is at least one vCPU that has flagged the address as
>                   * exclusive. */
> -                te->addr_write = address | TLB_EXCL;
> -            } else {
> -                te->addr_write = address;
> +                address |= TLB_EXCL;
>              }
>          }
> +        te->addr_write = address;

As mentioned before I think this bit belongs in the earlier patch.

>      } else {
>          te->addr_write = -1;
>      }
> diff --git a/softmmu_template.h b/softmmu_template.h
> index 267c52a..c54bdc9 100644
> --- a/softmmu_template.h
> +++ b/softmmu_template.h
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>
>      /* Handle an IO access or exclusive access.  */
>      if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
> -        if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == TLB_EXCL) {
> +        if (tlb_addr & TLB_EXCL) {
>              CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
>              CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
>              CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> @@ -500,8 +500,15 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>                  }
>              }
>
> -            glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
> -                                                    mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
> +            if (tlb_addr & ~(TARGET_PAGE_MASK | TLB_EXCL)) { /* MMIO
> access */

What about the other flags? Shouldn't this be tlb_addr & TLB_MMIO?

> +                glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
> +                                                         mmu_idx, index,
> +                                                         retaddr);
> +            } else {
> +                glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
> +                                                        mmu_idx, index,
> +                                                        retaddr);
> +            }
>
>              lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr, DATA_SIZE);
>
> @@ -620,7 +627,7 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>
>      /* Handle an IO access or exclusive access.  */
>      if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
> -        if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == TLB_EXCL) {
> +        if (tlb_addr & TLB_EXCL) {
>              CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
>              CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
>              CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> @@ -644,8 +651,15 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>                  }
>              }
>
> -            glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
> -                                                    mmu_idx, index, retaddr);
> +            if (tlb_addr & ~(TARGET_PAGE_MASK | TLB_EXCL)) { /* MMIO access 
> */
> +                glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
> +                                                         mmu_idx, index,
> +                                                         retaddr);
> +            } else {
> +                glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
> +                                                        mmu_idx, index,
> +                                                        retaddr);
> +            }
>
>              lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr, DATA_SIZE);


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]