qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/11] aspeed/smc: handle SPI flash Command m


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 07/11] aspeed/smc: handle SPI flash Command mode
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:22:36 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0

On 01/20/2017 11:17 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 01/20/2017 11:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 19 January 2017 at 20:35, Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 01/19/2017 08:26 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On 9 January 2017 at 16:24, Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> The Aspeed SMC controllers have a mode (Command mode) in which
>>>>> accesses to the flash content are no different than doing MMIOs. The
>>>>> controller generates all the necessary commands to load (or store)
>>>>> data in memory.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, accesses are restricted to the segment window assigned the
>>>>> the flash module by the controller. This window is defined by the
>>>>> Segment Address Register.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jeffery <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c         | 152 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>>  include/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.h |   2 +-
>>>>>  2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> This deleted the only call to aspeed_smc_is_usermode() but not
>>>> its definition, which makes clang complain:
>>>> /Users/pm215/src/qemu-for-merges/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c:409:20: error:
>>>> unused function 'aspeed_smc_is_usermode' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>>>
>>>> Presumably the function itself should be deleted?
>>>
>>> yes. This is correct. I will send a patch for it.
>>
>> I'll just edit the commit in my target-arm tree, that
>> will be simplest.
> 
> ok. sure. 
> 
> I do push a branch on github before sending for travis to test.
> Should that error have been caught by travis ? Just asking, as
> I might have missed it.

So I did miss it. I will take a closer look at the logs next time.

Thanks,

C.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]