qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.11 09/10] s390x/kvm: move KVM declarati


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 for-2.11 09/10] s390x/kvm: move KVM declarations and stubs to separate files
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:06:10 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0

On 17.08.2017 14:55, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.08.2017 14:35, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 17.08.2017 13:40, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 08/17/2017 06:22 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
[...]
>>>>   feat-src = $(SRC_PATH)/target/$(TARGET_BASE_ARCH)/
>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>> index 74d5b35..aeb730c 100644
>>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
>>>>   #include "exec/cpu-all.h"
>>>>     #include "fpu/softfloat.h"
>>>> +#include "kvm_s390x.h"
>>
>> Do we still need that? cpu.h should theoretically be independent from
>> kvm now, shouldn't it? And for the .c files, it's likely better to
>> include kvm_s390x.h directly there if they require it.
> 
> It should work if:
> 
> a) we include "sysemu/kvm.h" in hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> b) we include "target/s390x/kvm_s390x.h" in hw/intc/s390_flic_kvm.c
> c) we include "kvm_s390x.h" in "internal.h"
> d) we drop the "KVMState" parameter from kvm_s390_get_memslot_count()
> (separate patch)

Ok, that's rather a lot of changes already. Maybe that's rather
something for a later patch instead, so I'm also fine if you keep in
#include "kvm_s390x.h" in cpu.h here.

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]