quilt-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Quilt-dev] test suite improvements


From: John Vandenberg
Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] test suite improvements
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:45:36 +1100

On 1/17/06, Andreas Gruenbacher <address@hidden> wrote:
> http://zeroj.hda0.net/quilt-0.43-patches-v3/make-check.diff
>
> A really good idea.
>
> Some comments:
>
>  - I'd prefer something like test/.$test.ok (dot files).

ok.

>  - Can we have a check-all target that runs all tests?

good idea,

>  - Can we keep the general dependencies of each test in
>    Makefile.in instead of moving them to test/.depend, e.g.,
>
>         $(wildcard test/*.test) :: bin/quilt quilt/scripts/patchfns

i'll try that out.

>    There are other dependencies between specific commands and scripts,
>    but maybe we should define them explicitly in Makefile.in?

those can be automaticly determined as well using `quilt_command'.  I
dont think its worth recording these in Makefile.in, as the make
process generates them all indescriminately.  perhaps these extra deps
should be placed in test/.depend for the moment?

>  - You strip off test/*.test from TESTS and then always glue it on
>    again?

Yes; that makes the list of tests easier to manipulate.  One
consequence is that `make check-fold' is a valid rule.

>  - `echo $$test | sed -e 's/\.test/\.ok/'` => we already have this,
>    it should do:
>
>         test/%.ok :: test/%.test

thanks for picking that up.

>  - Why can't we include test/.depend whenever it's there?

as test/.depend is an include that is also a target, make will first
verify that it's not stale.  this is a performance hit for `default'
and 'install', and it clutters up make -d.

>  - Instead of patsubst we can use $(<:test/%=%) etc.

nice.

--
John




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]