rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rule-list] 386 & Slinky-v0.2.* status


From: Michael Fratoni
Subject: Re: [Rule-list] 386 & Slinky-v0.2.* status
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 00:10:17 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 02 May 2002 11:14 pm, Eugene Wong wrote:
> Hi again.
>
> I found out that the modules and the kernel are from different
> versions. One is from 2.2.* and the other is from 2.4.*

Hrmmm?
What exactly is the difficulty you are having? If this is a follow up to 
a previous post, I seem to have missed it.

> How did you all get RH installed with the incorrect modules? Am I
> misunderstanding something? Did I miss a few emails? Did I misread the
> documentation or not read some documentation?

If you are talking about the slinky installer, the kernel the installer 
uses is a slightly modified version of Red Hat's 2.4.9-31-BOOT kernel and 
the modules (available on my server) are from the same kernel.

To demonstrate:
address@hidden cdrom]# insmod 
/var/www/html/rule/slinky/MODULES/kernel/drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.o
/var/www/html/rule/slinky/MODULES/kernel/drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.o: 
kernel-module version mismatch
        /var/www/html/rule/slinky/MODULES/kernel/drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.o 
was compiled for kernel version 2.4.9-31RULE
        while this kernel is version 2.4.9-21.

The slinky-v0.2.1 images work here without difficulty.

Please detail the difficulties you're having, and we'll see if we can 
sort it out.

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjzSDakACgkQn/07WoAb/Su6iQCeI7bobN2J9A0OH7g1/OkCPi79
7DMAmweFUGhCMzZC7JQsgpgFcn0SFh+J
=6h0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]