Re: [Rule-list] 386 & Slinky-v0.2.* status

[Michael Fratoni]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 03 May 2002 12:41 am, Eugene Wong wrote:


> >To demonstrate:
> >address@hidden cdrom]# insmod
> >/var/www/html/rule/slinky/MODULES/kernel/drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.o
> >/var/www/html/rule/slinky/MODULES/kernel/drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.o:
> >kernel-module version mismatch
> >        
> > /var/www/html/rule/slinky/MODULES/kernel/drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.o was
> > compiled for kernel version 2.4.9-31RULE
> >         while this kernel is version 2.4.9-21.

> Perhaps I misunderstand the error message. Even in your example it says
> "kernel-module version mismatch". So, how does the network get set up
> with a kernel-module version mismatch? When I try:

Bad example, perhaps.
I was trying to show the version of the modules on the server.
That message isn't from theinstall kernel, it's from my web servers 
kernel.

> Perhaps I misunderstand the error message. Even in your example it says
> "kernel-module version mismatch". So, how does the network get set up
> with a kernel-module version mismatch? When I try:
>
> insmod .../ne.o
>
> then I also get a kernel-module version mismatch. I got the modules
> from your website at:

Using the installer kernel and the modules from my site?
Can you copy the full version mismatch message for me?

What kind of network card are you using? Perhaps I have one I can test 
with.

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjzSICYACgkQn/07WoAb/StuxQCgt4k9Pydcjoge0eJT3YNfx1P9
3mIAn3w8a3SR1hYIRHXqu+PgG/vvcT79
=fCuf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----