rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RULE] Re: Restricted requirements for RULE website


From: C David Rigby
Subject: Re: [RULE] Re: Restricted requirements for RULE website
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:58:12 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040312 Debian/1.6-3

Oops - thought I had sent it to the list.

I think staying with MySQL is doable & desirable. One of the nice features of this particular package is that it does not assume a monstrously powerful server. When a page is first requested, it is cached in a directory named, not surprisingly, CACHE. The trade off is thus between disk space on the one hand and CPU cycles on the other hand and response time on the, um, third hand. The administrator chooses a delay time. If the cached copy is younger than this, it is used. If older, the page is regenerated. The other nice feature is that if MySQL is unavailable, the cached copy is always used.

A site map function is essentially built in due to the hierarchical architecture, and there is also a backup function that can probably be "hijacked" to give us easy mirroring capability. Syndication is also built in, as is a search engine. Further, the package is designed to use some special characters, such as "{" and "}," in specific ways to indicate desired formatting. So it should not be too tough to prepare a text file with formatting that can be uploaded (even by simply pasting it into the editor field of the website's article creation function) that will then have template-controlled html functionality once it is published. Finally, there is a "private area" of the site to which the administrator grants access to others to be writers, editors, etc.

Anyway, that's a quick overview. I am working on converting some of the existing website content to work with it, and once I have a small demo ready, I'll advise people to come and take a look!

CDR

M. Fioretti wrote:
(CCing Rodolfo and the list so everybody is up to date)

On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 17:49:48 PM +0100, C David Rigby
(address@hidden) wrote:


I have been continuing to explore the CMS called SPIP that I
mentioned previously.  I am preparing a more detailed report with
respect to our requirements (both the original ones and the revised
set below) that I hope to present within a day or two.  I think that
it goes a long way to meeting our needs, but we will have to do at
least some customizing for our purposes.  That is always the case.

Also, since we have experienced some intermittent difficulties with
our mailing list, I may not have successfully gotten the word out
that I set up a testbed server that members of this list can use if
they would like to experiment with web site design or other
precedures. Send me an email if you would like an account.
Currently all access is via SSH or http.



OK, great, thanks a thousand. Just remember that map and mirror can be
easily ported to the new system, no need to do them again. Also, what
about keeping the MySQL database approach (see what I wrote about
scalability)? Do you think it would be possible?

As for the account, yes, do send it offlist as soon as you think it's
time to start testing.

Ciao,
        Marco Fioretti




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]