Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of nethack-el

[Ryan Yeske]

Loic Dachary <address@hidden> writes:

>  > bit confused on this point.  I never thought of patches as being
>  > licensed, which is why I thought that we had no choice.
> 
>       A small patch (roughtly < 15 lines of code) does not have to
> worry about licenses. Larger patches are usualy licensed under the
> same license as the original code but nothing forces them to be that
> way. Of course, licensing under an incompatible license does not
> make sense. But it's always the author choice.

We were wondering if there was the possibility of some sort of dual
licensing.  And, if not, is there the possibility of releasing
versions of the patch separately under different licenses?

Or, are there any other possible ways of being able to host the patch
on savannah and not create nasty license conflicts?

Ryan