[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS
From: |
Loic Dachary |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:22:31 +0200 |
mose writes:
>
> But I remain curious about the necessity to do that. Loic talked about
> dangers. What may occur if licence is only specified to be v2 and not
> later ? I'm okay it's not a problem, but what is the goal of that
> statement ?
>
The main problems addressed by the "or later" is upgrading the
license when:
- The author loses interest in her software or disapear and
cannot be reached. The license cannot be upgraded and the
software is locked down and dies (think GLUT for instance,
which is not GNU GPL'ed but paralyzed by a license similar
to the PHP4 license).
- The copyright laws change in 5 years from now and a GPL v3
is *required* to cope with these changes. Without the "or
later", upgrading the licenses of all GNU GPL'ed software
might be practically impossible because asking to each
copyright holder would be a living nightmare. If laws change
in such a way that GPL v2 cannot be used anymore, it will
have the effect that all "GPL v2 only" software must be
abandonned unless the copyright holder can be found and
convinced.
- Files from a distribution are scattered in many other GNU
GPL'ed software. Let's say one source file from a "GPL v2
only" distribution is convenient and re-used in many "GPL v2
or later" programs because the authors did not realize that
"GPL v2 only" on a single file would be
problematic. Upgrading the "GPL v2 or later" to "GPL v3 or
later" might become a living nightmare or force the author
to re-write the "GPL v2 only" part because she has to spend
countless hours to get in touch with the copyright holder of
this single file and beg her permission to release it under
the "GPL v3 or later". I've chased copyright holders in the
recent past and it is incredibly difficult. In short, one
should consider that a Free Software is not always
distributed as a whole: individual files are often re-used
in other Free Software.
I hope this clarifies the subject a bit,
--
Loic Dachary http://www.dachary.org/ address@hidden
12 bd Magenta http://www.senga.org/ address@hidden
75010 Paris T: 33 1 42 45 07 97 address@hidden
GPG Public Key: http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt
- [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, gnu, 2002/06/25
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Loic Dachary, 2002/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Loic Dachary, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, mose, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Mathieu Roy, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, mose, 2002/06/27
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS,
Loic Dachary <=
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] savannah.gnu.org: submission of CCMS, Mathieu Roy, 2002/06/27