Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: Savannah Projects Approval

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:25:15PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 06:09:05PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> > Hello Daniel,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 10:47:45PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 04:36:37AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > > >We are pleased to announce that we are now able to accept new 
> > > > >projects at Savannah again. It took us a long while to build a secure 
> > > > >environnement, as well as a gathering additional volunteers to study 
> > > > >and maintain it.
> > > > >
> > > > >Some of you submitted your projects a long time ago and probably 
> > > > >tried another service by now. If you wish, we would be glad to help 
> > > > >you move to Savannah; if you don't, please let us know. We will keep 
> > > > >pending projects during one month, waiting for your reply.
> > > 
> > > I couldn't tell from this if you needed a reply from people still
> > > waiting for Savannah?
> > 
> > Yes.  If we don't hear from the people who registered projects in thirty
> > days, those registrations will be deleted.
> > 
> > > If so, the binutils webpages product still needs
> > > a home (and has no alternative to Savannah since it's for www.gnu.org).
> > 
> > OK.  Please note, that we are going through the pending queue in
> > chronological, so if your project was submitted in the last couple of
> > months, you might have to wait a short while longer while we tend to
> > older registration requests.
> 
> Sorry, one last thing: the `binutils' project type is set to GNU, but
> AFAIK GNU binutils is still holsted at sources.redhat.com.  Is this project
> to be a web-only project (i.e., the ability to update
> www.gnu.org/software/binutils) or a fully blown GNU project (with CVS hosted
> at Savannah) ?

Sorry, web-only.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz