Re: [Simulavr-devel] remote protocol and signals

[reinhard . jessich]

On Mon, 07 Jan 2002, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> :)> Does anyone have any objections to implementing both methods?
> :)No. It is better to have the signal method to rest the simulator, than to
> :)restart gdb.
> 
> I'm a little confused. Are you saying you are okay with this?
I ment it is better to have the signal SIGHUP now, than to wait until we
found how to implement a reset command. This could take a while.
If we have the solution, we can implement the reset command and still have the
signal SIGHUP, if this is necessary.

--
 Ing. Reinhard Jessich              mailto: address@hidden
 A-1190 Vienna, Goergengasse 2/2/1  phone: +43/1/3692600
 http://members.telering.at/jessich mobile: +43/664/1735439