Re: [Simulavr-devel] anacomp example

[Michael Hennebry]

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Klaus Rudolph wrote:
> Knut Schwichtenberg schrieb:

> > just a short question: What the h... has happened to the extended
> > documentation and examples I wrote and sent to Willam aprox. one year
> > ago? Several open issues missing in the ordinary documentation have
> > been answered by Klaus and are entered into the revised
> > documentation. Reading the same questions and answers here again does
> > not progress the project.

> You are right! I have nothing done on the project for more then one
> year. And I was not exited of hearing every user crying for broken
> autotools. So I placed my last local work area sources which have many
> patched applied. And it seems that this is an acceptable startpoint.
>
> For documentation issues I have done nothing.I saw that there were a lot
> updates in the docs so I though that all changes are in.
>
> In the bug tracking or patches of savannah are nothing belongs to the
> docs?! Only the new bug report with patchfiles from Joel.

When Knut documentation was written, no bug numbers were involved.
The first simulavr bug number I saw on the list was two weeks ago.
The next was last Sunday.
Since then, there have been several.

I've only used a bug-tracking system once and suspect this one is different.
If I want to get involved again, what FM should I R?

--
Michael   address@hidden
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist:   The glass is half full.
Engineer:   The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."