|
From: | Klaus Rudolph |
Subject: | Re: [Simulavr-devel] new joel simulavrxx autoconf tarball |
Date: | Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:36:50 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Hi Joel,I did a merge to actual cvs on my system and tried to do a bootstrap/configure but run into trouble:
------------- with_bfd_path = /home/zfrdh/work/binutils-2.19/build_avr with_libiberty_path = check nm: '/home/zfrdh/work/binutils-2.19/build_avr/lib/libbfd.a': No such fileconfigure: error: /home/zfrdh/work/binutils-2.19/build_avr DOES NOT appear to be the location of the avr-built lib/libbfd.a or include/bfd.h or is an incompatable version of the avr libbfd\n Please use the --with-bfd-path=<path to your avr-built libbfd library>
-----------The problem seems to be, that the default build of binutils has no path "libs". On my build it is ".libs". A copy of libbfd is also direct in bfd.
Could you expand the tests as needed? After I fake that in my binutils path I could compile! Fine! But now I have no simulavr.so and swig was not running. So no example could run :-( Whats my problem? ----After fixing this I will test a bit and then I will write that to cvs. But actually I am not able to do any test, because no executable is available for the tests :-)
Thanks Klaus
Some improvements since earlier this week. Hoping it is approaching "good enough". The new version is at: http://www.rtems.org/ftp/pub/rtems/people/joel/simulavrxx/ Eric W. tried it on MingW and that lead to these changes: - --disable-tcl added - if tcl.h not found, disable tcl I did the following - add configure regression suite to autoconf - runs it for "make check" - passes all regression tests (no work on my part, just saying) - detect ddd. If you have it, the various debug scripts use it. Otherwise, they just invoke gdb directly. Various things from Knut Schwichtenberg <address@hidden> - stdiodemo (UART and LCD) - LCD code improvements to work like real hardware - added AT Keyboard example This builds on Fedora 10. Might build elsewhere but who knows. I only address one issue. :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |