simulavr-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Simulavr-devel] Support for atmega2560 in the future?


From: mzenzes
Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Support for atmega2560 in the future?
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:37:51 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Hi,

Ok, I understand that this is an Open Source movement. It lives from the work done by normal people like you. I'm thankful for that. But I'm sorry, I'm not willing to donate my free-time for a project like this, I hope you understand. I succeeded to let simulavr run on my computer[1]. Thats a whole bunch of work for me ;-)

I hope other people will find time to support you, and I hope I will do so, in the future!
Greetings
Martin

[1] In the README it's noticed "./configure --enable-bfd=DIRECTORY_TO_BINUTILS/BFD" but correct would be "./configure --with-bfd=/DIR-TO-AVR-TOOLKIT-ROOT


ThomasK schrieb:
Hi Martin,

First off: I'm glad this project is alive again, thanks a lot! It would be great to use a small simluator with newer avr's on a linux. Enough flowers.

Alive? Really? ;-) Ok, it's right, that some here have made some effort on it, but: that's not really official in the moment. I assume, that you have read the postings in the last months. So, you know, that there is a git repo with some newer development. If you want to use that, then we could really say, that there is a little bit live in it ... :-)

I know my question is not that fair, because the atmega2560 is a relatively complex and new piece of hardware. But I'm using one right

On my first look to atmega2560, it's not a very big step. There is no new, excotic hardware on it. Timer and USART look as the same as other atmega parts. I'm not sure, if the bigger flash space will bring some problems and I've not compared the instruction set.

So it's not impossible in my opinion, to get this part into simulavr. But the question is: when? In the moment you are the one and only, which wants to use this part. (ok, the one and only, which writes here about this device. ;-) ) But if you agree to do some on it forself (and if you have some experience in coding C/C++), then it's not so far. :-)

IF you want to do some and you havn't a problem, that our changes on git repo are not in the official repo, (we have no statement form simulavr maintainers) then you should start with installing git, cloning Onno's git repo (the master branch), trying to build it, look around, what's there ... and send your questions to mailing list! ;-)


That's for now, greetings, Thomas


_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]