[Sks-devel] Re: Mini-SKS

[Yaron Minsky]

It's possible now.  You could run "sks db" without running the "sks
recon" process that does the reconciliation.  You should still
configure SKS with the email addresses of some other PKS servers, so
that keys submitted to your keyserver will be forwarded to the PKS
system at large.  If you don't provide the email addresses, SKS will
litter your logfile with complaints, but otherwise things should work
normally.

I've forwarded this to SKS-devel in case anyone there has some input.

y

On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:16:47 +0300, Robert Golovniov
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hello Yaron,
> 
>   I  have  a  very  small  disk (1Gb) with OpenBSD 3.4 installed on it
>   (could  change  to  Debian in time). I realize this small disk would
>   not  suffice  to  run a normal SKS server. But I still would like to
>   run  at  least  a  kind of mini-SKS for a few machines on our LAN. I
>   estimate  that  in  the  long  run it would have to hold up to a few
>   hundred  keys  or  so (mainly for the signature-verification and WOT
>   purposes). Do you think that should be possible? Or do I rather have
>   to forget this idea altogether?
> 
>   Additionally,  how  can I switch off the synchronization function of
>   the key, so that the size of the log files does not become too big?
> 
>   Many thanks in advance for your kind help.
> 
>   Greetings.
> 
> - --
>              -=Robert & Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> mailto:address@hidden&Body=Embedded%20key
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: Using PGP/GnuPG for Internet privacy.
> 
> iD8DBQFA2WaJWh2fA2M/bQcRAh7wAJ0edNbd6YM58Han5aMyANxvbAcV5gCg3Ztq
> 8LkzHY5POJ4St5B12hZ5KbA=
> =F/lN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
>