[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social-discuss] Federation
|
From: |
Matt Lee |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Social-discuss] Federation |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:35:06 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3 |
On 08/24/2009 07:55 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> The last I heard, Social was going to extend the Open MicroBlogging
> protocol for social networking, thus making Social federated in the same
> way Laconica is.
Not sure. But if someone writes it like that, then maybe.
Personally, I'd be in favor of making a seperate thing, the Libre Social
protocol or something.
> Personally, I'm on the fence as to whether or not this is a good idea,
> but maybe it is. Time will tell.
Extending OMB, or Social in general? If you're referring to Social, you
could *try* being a little more positive ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature