Hi Brett
Many thanks for taking the time to post. Not 100% sure which direction
the GNU Social folks will go, but I'm pretty convinced by your
arguments. What I've seen of elgg so far I like. I'd encourage GNU
social to jump on board at either the 1.7 or 1.8 marks, but am unsure
what will happen in the short term. Matt Lee, the lead dev, asked me
to set up a test instance which ive done here:
http://gnusocial.me/
Independently, I have 3 php devs, and we've decided to get more
involved with elgg, with a view to contributing code. Your community
seems open and friendly, which is a huge plus for us.
Our area of expertise is semantic web technology and that's where we'll
aim to start offering patches in that area.
I've already located a security vulnerability with the sha1mbox ... if
you take a nick and add @
hotmail.com @
gmail.com @
yahoo.com etc then take an sha1sum you can
often reverse engineer the email address, so that's something we can
fix up too.
W3C is also known to be looking for a social networking site for their
home page, so if I can get elgg to a state where it's pretty standards
compliant, hopefully we can push that forward.
I've bookmarked #elgg on freenode, so perhaps we can continue
conversations there. I'm looking forward to a hopefully great
collaboration!
Best wishes
Melvin