social-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Social-discuss] The Case for Branching Elgg?


From: Story Henry
Subject: Re: [Social-discuss] The Case for Branching Elgg?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:56:31 +0100

On 8 Apr 2010, at 13:00, Melvin Carvalho wrote:

> 2010/4/3 Sean Corbett <address@hidden>
> 
>> It certainly seems doable and the code base is very nice and
>> straightforward; Ian and I have actually been spending time with it trying
>> to figure out a way to get two Elgg instances we've installed on our school
>> network to "talk to each other."  Of course I think there would need to be a
>> lot more work done on it to attain all the goals that we've established, but
>> it would provide a useful basis for development.
>> 
> 
> I've started fixing up the FOAF in elgg, so that instances can become part
> of the (federated) foaf cloud.  You can start to see some of the results
> here:
> 
> http://www.foafer.org/?file=http%3A%2F%2Fgnusocial.me%2Fpg%2Fprofile%2Fbblfish%3Fview%3Dfoaf
> 
> Right now you can browse from profile to profile, across server boundries.
> To make profile browsing completely federated, I'll need to allow links out
> (links in are already possible).

btw, one thing that could be quite cool, would be to add virtuoso to Elgg

 http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/

One could then leave the mysql DB as it is now, and yet have an RDF view on it,
including all the rdf tools one probably needs. I think Virtuoso will be part 
of KDE...


Henry



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]