[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] questions
From: |
Eric Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] questions |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:00:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Mostafa Razavi <address@hidden> writes:
> It isn't in that list. All the fonts in the Font Path are in
> /usr/share/fonts/X11/ while the ttf fonts are in
> /usr/share/fonts/truetype. I tried adding that to the list with "xset
> fp+" but I got a "bad font path element" error. I also tried googling
> to learn a bit more about fonts in X, but damn, anything I find is at
> least a few years old (references to the late xfree86 are
> abundant). Seems like the last time people had font problems was
> several years ago!
>
> Question is, if the ttf fonts are not in the font path, how come emacs
> can use them?
emacs uses fontconfig and xft nowadays. I don't know if stumpwm
uses xft, but "grep -iR xft *" and "grep -iR fontc *" in the
stumpwm sources didn't get a result, so I assume it doesn't.
As "grep -iR xft *" in the sources for the debian package
of cl-clx-sbcl didn't turn up anything, I doubt that clx
provides support for xft. And stumpwm uses clx to communicate
with the X server, so no xft in stumpwm too, I assume.
Sorry to disappoint you,
Eric
> Thanks,
> Mostafa
- [STUMP] questions, Mostafa Razavi, 2012/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [STUMP] questions, Mostafa Razavi, 2012/03/10
- Re: [STUMP] questions,
Eric Wolf <=
- Message not available
- Re: [STUMP] questions, Mostafa Razavi, 2012/03/11
- Re: [STUMP] questions, David Bjergaard, 2012/03/11
- Re: [STUMP] questions, Jason F. McBrayer, 2012/03/12
- Re: [STUMP] questions, tychoish, 2012/03/13
- Re: [STUMP] questions, Mostafa Razavi, 2012/03/13
- Re: [STUMP] questions, Lucas Pandolfo, 2012/03/13
- Re: [STUMP] questions, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/03/13