[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu soc status
|
From: |
Sam Steingold |
|
Subject: |
Re: gnu soc status |
|
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:28:39 -0400 |
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Karl Berry <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Sam, are you there? Without some input ...
I am less than ecstatic about the proposal as it now stands -
basically, he just rehashes the project description.
I left some comments there.
--
Sam Steingold <http://sds.podval.org>
- Re: gnu soc status, (continued)
- Re: gnu soc status, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/04/10
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/10
- Re: gnu soc status, Micah Cowan, 2009/04/10
- my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/10
- Re: my annual complaint, Karl Berry, 2009/04/10
- Re: my annual complaint, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Thomas Lord, 2009/04/14
- Re: my annual complaint, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Tom Tromey, 2009/04/11
- Re: gnu soc status,
Sam Steingold <=
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/12
- Re: gnu soc status, Thomas Schwinge, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Karl Berry, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, phcoder, 2009/04/15
- Re: gnu soc status, Bean, 2009/04/15