[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Available slots
|
From: |
Tom Tromey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Available slots |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:20:16 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Micah> If you're not thrilled with either of those proposals, please let us
Micah> (Karl, James, and myself) know. If you think your favorite proposal
Micah> should get in ahead of these, let us know.
I don't understand how the rankings ended up the way they did. My
recollection is that the gdb/python proposal was higher up than it is
now. Why did it get pushed so far down? If it was due to the GDB/MI
thing, then that was in error, because that project is an Emacs
project, not a GDB one.
Tom
- Re: Available slots, (continued)
- Re: Available slots, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Leslie P. Polzer, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Karl Berry, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Available slots, Kirill Kononenko, 2009/04/15
- Re: Available slots, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/15
Re: Available slots,
Tom Tromey <=