Re: Available slots

[Kirill Kononenko]

Just like you I am not going to continue this discussion. It seems
like people are too focused on proving that they are correct, instead
of trying to cooperate. I don't think it will be good for GNU in the
long term.


Thanks,
Kirill

2009/4/15 Kirill Kononenko <address@hidden>:
> Anyways, as I told before I don't really plan to mentor
> Matthias-Christian. SoC admins are free to do whatever they want.
> Including banning from SoC mentoring. But I don't think it will be
> good for GNU in the long term.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kirill
>
> 2009/4/15 Kirill Kononenko <address@hidden>:
>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:15:41AM +0400, Kirill Kononenko wrote:
>>>
>>>> > Every time you interfere with the slots, you're interfering with our
>>>> > ability to resolve the remaining _real_ (unresolved) conflicts. With
>>>> > the
>>>>
>>>> How does in interfere. I don't get reason - sequence chain here. You
>>>> simply put them down at end of story. These scores only represent
>>>> private cummulative opinion of people. So you make at least 2 logical
>>>> errors in one sentence.
>>>
>>> It seems that you do not understand the basic mechanics of how the
>>> ranking/conflict resolution works. Please learn it, instead of blaming
>>> others.
>>
>> I am sorry but I copy/pasted you how ranking/conflict resolution
>> works. I have been both a summer of code student and summer of code
>> mentor.
>>
>>>
>>> I want you to know that Micah has my (and probably others') full support
>>> on this -- he did the right thing, and apologized as much as the
>>> situation warrants. Please stop slinging mud at him.
>>>
>>> -antrik-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kirill
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://code.google.com/p/libjit-linear-scan-register-allocator/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://code.google.com/p/libjit-linear-scan-register-allocator/
>



-- 
http://code.google.com/p/libjit-linear-scan-register-allocator/