[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A thought on portability...
From: |
Nelson Minar |
Subject: |
Re: A thought on portability... |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Feb 1997 16:19:22 -0500 |
Hey folks, sorry I missed out on the shindig. I hope you all had chile
rellenos for me.
We talked about the
typedef unsigned short unsigned32;
typedef short int32;
typedef double ieee64;
thing back when we started Swarm. It's not such a bad idea on the face
of it. But, well, it's unaesthetic - it's not really C code, it's
trying to make C do something that it just doesn't do. In my
experience systems that do this don't work very well.
OTOH, it's really nice to know exactly how big your datatypes are,
*especially* when doing simulation. I really like the fact that Java
makes guarantees, even if the Alpha folks hate it because it means
their fancy 64 bit processors aren't good for much.
Overall, I think there's really no good answer for this.