[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Benchmarks: Graphics vs. batch, Linux vs. Windows
|
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
|
Subject: |
Re: Benchmarks: Graphics vs. batch, Linux vs. Windows |
|
Date: |
10 May 1999 11:31:16 -0700 |
>>>>> "LRA" == M Lang / S Railsback <address@hidden> writes:
LRA> Windows takes 33% longer for graphics mode than Linux.
Interesting. If it were just a raster I'd expect that Windows would
be faster than X11 on Redhat, since the raster support for Windows
uses memory mapped bitmaps, something I'd expect to be very fast.
But I can't say it breaks my heart to hear that the Linux-based system
beats Windows (heh, even if I'm the one to blame).
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.