Re: [Swarm-Support] Must swarm be built directly in its source directory ?

[amores nolikeyjunk]

> I ran into this same issue a few days ago. I've never used
> cygwin, but in UNIX this indicated that emacs was not
> installed (correctly). Check to see if you have emacs
> installed. The 'missing' is just filled-in (by config scripts)
> in place of the missing executable; that is, in place of the
> missing emacs binary (at least this appears to be the case).

Thanks, that appears to have been it, as now I get further.
In fact, now I'm trying to compile elc (emacs macros, I guess),
and I fail on a path which has one slash turned the wrong way
(ie, one backslash occurs, where clearly a regular slash
was intended).

I'm going to try the cvs swarm code instead, in case this
apparent bug hash been fixed there, before trying to track
down and fix this bug myself.

(I assume some test somewhere deduced that because I'm on
MS-Windows, I want backslashes, although this is not true
in the case of cygwin, and is actually unneeded for the
entire NT/2000 family AFAIK.)

Cordially,

Perry


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus