[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup:found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver
From: |
Paul Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup:found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:26:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) |
OK, I will work on this soon.
Please help me understand this gap. If I'm working on code in my
directory, I can set break points for particular line numbers with
break main.m:10
or
ObserverSwarm.m:55
If I want to set a break point in a Swarm library file, it APPEARS to me
that gdb knows what to do. Surprises me, really.
(gdb) break List.m:55
No source file named List.m.
Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y
But how does gdb know where to find List.m line 55 if "make install" has
been run already and the libraries are being used out of /usr?
Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Scott Christley wrote:
The problem was that the default application path was not correct, so
the file was not being found.
It looks to me that this isn't the issue. I stepped through in the
debugger and checked the file being opened in _load_ in LispArchiver.m.
It's correct and opens ok. (I just ran heatbugs, thus it opened
./heatbugs.scm.)
But I see there are some nested functions in LispArchiver.m that would
be invoked during the load process, that might be causing problems.
Or perhaps someone might try performing the steps of lispAppArchiver
creation in separate steps in initDefobj (instead of the nested method
calls). There have been compiler problems in that area before too.
Marcus
_______________________________________________
Support mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.swarm.org/mailman/listinfo/support
--
Paul E. Johnson email: address@hidden
Professor, Political Science http://pj.freefaculty.org
1541 Lilac Lane, Rm 504
University of Kansas Office: (785) 864-9086
Lawrence, Kansas 66044-3177 FAX: (785) 864-5700
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-around for missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Paul Johnson, 2006/08/15
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-around for missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/15
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-around for missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Bill Northcott, 2006/08/16
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-around for missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Rick Riolo, 2006/08/16
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Scott Christley, 2006/08/16
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup:found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too,
Paul Johnson <=
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup:found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/17
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup:found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/19
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/19
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Bill Northcott, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Bill Northcott, 2006/08/21
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/21
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Bill Northcott, 2006/08/21
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Darren Schreiber, 2006/08/21
- Re: [Swarm-Support] Followup: found work-aroundfor missing~/swarmarchiver.scm too, Marcus G. Daniels, 2006/08/21