Re: [Texmacs-dev] Postscript image too big? - help

[Alvaro Tejero Cantero]

Quoting Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>:

> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:39:10PM +0200, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
> > > If you are in a hurry, I recommend to convert your image into one
> > > of a slightly lower resolution, if possible.
> > 
> > I am unlucky, the structures appearing are very fine and I cannot
> therefore
> > escape this order of magnitude in the size of the plot. The only
> other
> > possibility (but it involves a great deal of work) would be to break
> up the
> > image into a mosaic, and place all the bits together inside a TeXmacs
> figure.
> 
> Can you please make the image available on the web. This will allow
> me to play around with it and I will try to quickly find a solution.
> I might try to see whether I can bypass scheme and remain entirely
> inside C++.
> This should be possible, since we are dealing with postscript
> graphics,
> which require no conversions.

I just managed to produce a much smaller version ~2M that will be sufficient
(fortunately!). Although for less complex figures contour plots yield smaller
files, for the ones I was plotting now density plots are better.

I also received one suggestion to rasterize the postscript images through gs,
though I didn't try it.

I can, still, make an image of this kind available on the web for debugging
purposes.


I am very thankful for your assistance, 

'Alvaro.


> There is still another thing you may try:
> 
>       (debug-set! stack 100000000)
> 
> in progs/kernel/boot/compat.scm. Please let me know whether this
> helps.
> 
> Best wishes, Joris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
> 



Alvaro Tejero Cantero
Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics
Ludwig-Maximilian Universitaet
Muenchen