Re: [XForms] xforms on epel - no doc rpm

[Rex Dieter]

On 05/27/2015 01:20 PM, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:11:17PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > On 05/26/2015 02:31 PM, Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:
> > > Hi Rex,
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 02:00:39PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > On 05/26/2015 12:25 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > > > > I notice that the xforms rpms on epel are xforms and xforms-devel.
> > > > >
> > > > > The xforms-doc rpm (with all of the example code and whatnot) is not there.
> > > >
> > > > Neither fedora (or epel) ever shipped a xforms-doc pkg as far as I'm
> > > > aware.  Is this an implicit request that it should?  If so, what
> > > > content should it contain exactly?  Stuff from demos/ ?
> > >
> > > No, the demo programs aren't the documentation,
> >
> > OK, I won't include demos/ (even though the embedded xforms.spec in
> > the tarball does exactly that).
>
> What I meant is that the "demos" aren't the whole documenation,
> but they should definitely be considered as part of the docu-
> mentation.

Ah, ok, epel updates that include a -doc subpkg submitted,

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xforms-1.2.4-5.el7
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xforms-1.2.4-5.el6

should get pushed out to -testing repos within a day or 2.

-- rex