[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beamer.el update candidate
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: beamer.el update candidate |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Dec 2022 23:45:51 +0900 |
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> Does it make sense to use same trick here what booktabs.el does, i.e.,
> using an (ignore) between the 2 optional arguments[1]? If we agree on
> doing this exception for "overlay arguments" and "optional key=val
> arguments" we could introduce a `TeX-arg-ignore' or something like that
> in (la)tex.el.
Hmm... generally speaking, it isn't clear whether we should insert such
dummy separator into adjacent options. I'd prefer let-binding
`TeX-insert-macro-default-style' to `show-all-optional-args' in
`LaTeX--env-parse-args'. I expect that wouldn't bother existing users.
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
- beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/03
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/03
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/03
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/03
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/08
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/08
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/09
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Arash Esbati, 2022/12/09
- Re: beamer.el update candidate,
Ikumi Keita <=
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/09
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/10
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/11
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/12
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/12
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/12
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/12
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Arash Esbati, 2022/12/13
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/13
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Arash Esbati, 2022/12/13