Re: support for latexmk?

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "AE" == Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:

> Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
>> But so far it is a nice feature

> Thanks, maybe you test it a little more and see how AUCTeX manages any
> error messages issued by LatexMk and/or LaTeX.  I'm not sure how good it
> works in that area.

As we speak/write, my test document has an error that seems a bit
difficult to stop. So latexmk at first tries to suggest to use the -f
(force option) which I am not going to do. Depending on the size of the
document, I would intuively switch to vanilla latex, in my case the
document has only 7 pages (but is somehow complex), so for larger
document that might be an issue.


> Further, there was a report here about the current implementation not
> being optimal[1].  Maybe we have to change `TeX-run-format' to
> `TeX-run-TeX' at the end.


I had a quick look at the issue but fail to see the problem, I can spot
any problem, but then I am running the latest master, sorry main. 🤪


>> (so is Pauls) maybe at some point his code could be merged into
>> AuCTeX?

> At some point, we will approach Paul and discuss with him what we
> can/want to include into AUCTeX, but that will have to wait a little.

> Best, Arash

> Footnotes:
> [1]  https://github.com/tom-tan/auctex-latexmk/pull/40#issuecomment-2208807071

-- 
I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military. 
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature