[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a rather larger inconvience
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: a rather larger inconvience |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2024 19:40:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
> I have plain confidence in your coding and rightly so 😉.
Thanks, just don't expect too much :-)
> I applied the patch, recompiled, tested and voila it works as expected
Great. For the sake of completeness: C-c C-v for viewing the final
product works as well in this setup?
> Yeah, but I prefer not to mess with the custom interface and leave that
> as a method of last resort. Every time you guys add some new commands the
> customized variable is basically useless. 🙃
It usually happens once in 2 decades that the default value of a custom
variable is changed, but I'm surprised to hear that custom can't deal
with it. It is what it is.
Best, Arash
- Re: support for latexmk?, (continued)
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- [a rather larger inconvience] (was: support for latexmk?), Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Paul Nelson, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/18
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Ikumi Keita, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/22