[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?
From: |
Uwe Siart |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2005 14:19:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi,
the AUCTeX manual now says:
,----[ (info "(auctex)Installation under MS Windows") ]
| 10. Run `make install' in the installation directory.
|
| 11. With XEmacs, AUCTeX and preview-latex should now be active by
| default. With Emacs, acticavation depends on a working
| `site-start.d' directory or similar setup, since then the startup
| files `auctex.el' and `preview-latex.el' will have been placed
| there. If this has not been done, you should be able to load the
| startup files manually with
| (load "auctex.el" nil t t)
| (load "preview-latex.el" nil t t)
| in either a site-wide `site-start.el' or your personal startup file
| (usually accessible as `~/.emacs' from within Emacs and
| `~/.xemacs/init.el' from within XEmacs).
`----
Does this mean that (require 'tex-site) is no longer the preferred way
to activate AUCTeX. The lines cited above could be understood in such a
way that
(load "auctex.el" nil t t)
(load "preview-latex.el" nil t t)
are the commands to be put in site-start.el. Is this true now? I'm
worried because another section in the manual still says
,----[ (info "(auctex)Loading the package") ]
| For GNU Emacs, the recommended way to activate AUCTeX is to add the
| following line to your `.emacs' file:
|
| (require 'tex-site)
`----
--
Uwe
- [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?,
Uwe Siart <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/21