[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?
From: |
Uwe Siart |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2005 15:26:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, mostly. Loading auctex.el has the advantage that it has the path
> to tex-site.el hardwired into it: that way you are pretty sure to get
> the most up-to-date version of AUCTeX even if other tex-site.el are
> flying around on your system. Given the number of error reports where
> people had an old tex-site.el shadowing the new installation, I think
> this is prudent.
And the hardwired path ensures that in the future there are no old
auctex.el's (pointing to old tex-site.el's) shadowing the new
installation? Isn't this just another link in the chain?
--
Uwe
- [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?,
Uwe Siart <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/21