[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2005 14:56:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Siart <address@hidden> writes:
> the AUCTeX manual now says:
>
> ,----[ (info "(auctex)Installation under MS Windows") ]
> | 10. Run `make install' in the installation directory.
> |
> | 11. With XEmacs, AUCTeX and preview-latex should now be active by
> | default. With Emacs, acticavation depends on a working
> | `site-start.d' directory or similar setup, since then the startup
> | files `auctex.el' and `preview-latex.el' will have been placed
> | there. If this has not been done, you should be able to load the
> | startup files manually with
> | (load "auctex.el" nil t t)
> | (load "preview-latex.el" nil t t)
> | in either a site-wide `site-start.el' or your personal startup file
> | (usually accessible as `~/.emacs' from within Emacs and
> | `~/.xemacs/init.el' from within XEmacs).
> `----
>
> Does this mean that (require 'tex-site) is no longer the preferred way
> to activate AUCTeX.
Yes, mostly. Loading auctex.el has the advantage that it has the path
to tex-site.el hardwired into it: that way you are pretty sure to get
the most up-to-date version of AUCTeX even if other tex-site.el are
flying around on your system. Given the number of error reports where
people had an old tex-site.el shadowing the new installation, I think
this is prudent.
It also means that a user can do
(unload-feature 'tex-site)
and have AUCTeX removed for all practical purposes. Something like
that is important if we want to encourage using AUCTeX as a system
default. The current Emacs/XEmacs code of unload-feature will not
work after (require 'tex-site).
> The lines cited above could be understood in such a way that
>
> (load "auctex.el" nil t t)
> (load "preview-latex.el" nil t t)
>
> are the commands to be put in site-start.el. Is this true now?
Yes.
> I'm worried because another section in the manual still says
>
> ,----[ (info "(auctex)Loading the package") ]
> | For GNU Emacs, the recommended way to activate AUCTeX is to add the
> | following line to your `.emacs' file:
> |
> | (require 'tex-site)
> `----
That is because I am still working on the non-Windows installation
instructions and have not checked in an update yet.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/21