Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency

[Artur Lipowski]

Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Artur Lipowski wrote:
> > This is (iom162_h_p1.patch) my proposal to make m162 USART signal names 
> > consistent with rest of the world.
> >
> > The second patch (iom162_h_p1.patch) prohibits compilation of code with 
> > old signal names.
>
> I don't think these will go in.
>
> I had tried to do this a while back and met some resistance so I dropped it:
>
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2002-12/msg00074.html
...

Does this mean that we *must* change existing signal names for eg. ATmega8?

Regards,
--
Artur Lipowski