[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:48:30 -0700 |
On 25 Feb 2004 at 22:36, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Artur Lipowski wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is (iom162_h_p1.patch) my proposal to make m162 USART signal names
> > consistent with rest of the world.
> >
> > The second patch (iom162_h_p1.patch) prohibits compilation of code with
> > old signal names.
>
> I don't think these will go in.
>
> I had tried to do this a while back and met some resistance so I dropped it:
>
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2002-12/msg00074.html
>
However, from that thread, there is *strong* support for creating a "generic"
uart layer over
this, that way users could create uart code that is compatible across many AVR
devices. IIRC,
we all have agreed that that is a Desirable Thing, but noboby has implemented
it.
Eric
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Clemens Buchacher, 2004/02/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/29
Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency,
E. Weddington <=