[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:37:12 -0700 |
On 27 Feb 2004 at 15:50, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As Colin O'Flynn wrote:
>
> > Would there be any interest in a program to check for legal SIGNAL /
> > INTERRUPT names?
>
> Something like:
>
> sigcheck: $(TARGET).elf
> nm $(TARGET).elf | grep SIG_ >/dev/null && \
> echo "Warning: it is likely that there are misspelled SIG_* names"
>
> ?
>
> :-)
>
> Normally, all SIG_* names are supposed to be resolved into _vector_N
> names by the preprocessor magic. So if any SIG_ survived into the
> output symbol table, that is most likely the programmer's fault.
Hmm, method doesn't seem to work. I don't know why yet ....
- [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency, Artur Lipowski, 2004/02/17
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/02/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Joerg Wunsch, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking,
E. Weddington <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Clemens Buchacher, 2004/02/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/29
Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency, E. Weddington, 2004/02/26