[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:15:13 -0700 |
On 27 Feb 2004 at 17:53, Colin O'Flynn wrote:
> Oh yeah, one more thing.
>
> How should I deal with #define'd SIG_ names? I figure the only way would be to
> do as suggested and look up in the output for SIG_
>
> ie:
> #define UART SIG_UART_0
>
> SIGNAL(UART)
Shot in the dark:
Maybe in the makefile, run the preprocessor on the files and look at the
preprocessed output?
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Joerg Wunsch, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/27
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking,
E. Weddington <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, E. Weddington, 2004/02/28
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Clemens Buchacher, 2004/02/29
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] SIGNAL / INTERRUPT checking, Colin O'Flynn, 2004/02/29
Re: [avr-libc-dev] patch for iom162.h - signal name consistency, E. Weddington, 2004/02/26