Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf

[Joerg Wunsch]

As E. Weddington wrote:

> Makes sense. I'm also going to have to go through the IO headers
> with a comb now and fix up the problems I created (a la bug
> #11486). This might mean a 1.2.1 release. Sorry for the hassle.

No problem at all.  I think it's a lot better to roll yet another
release within a month or so, than to push the next release date
forever since this and that and that one and ... still need to be done
before releasing something new.

> My goal is to see what it would take to *just* get the autotool
> upgrade working, and doing the lib/device thing later.

OK, fine with me.  I'm the last one to mourn if we don't need
ancient tools anymore. ;-)

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)