[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:35:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
As E. Weddington wrote:
> Do you think the version checking in the reconf script is strictly
> necessary?
No idea.
If all works well with newer versions, I don't care.
I'd first like to deal with bug #4101 though.
About the multilib thingy, remember there's a separate branch in CVS
where Ted started to experiment.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Russell Shaw, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, E. Weddington, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/05