Re: [avr-libc-dev] reconf

[Russell Shaw]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
> > Do you think the version checking in the reconf script is strictly
> > necessary?
>
> No idea.
>
> If all works well with newer versions, I don't care.
>
> I'd first like to deal with bug #4101 though.
>
> About the multilib thingy, remember there's a separate branch in CVS
> where Ted started to experiment.

Slightly OT, http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2004/msg00230.html.
Newlib supports multilib problems, and is also a place to put
board support packages.