[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: posix vs default mode nonsense
|
From: |
Zachary Santer |
|
Subject: |
Re: posix vs default mode nonsense |
|
Date: |
Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:41:16 -0400 |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 11:30 AM Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
>
> but that won't help with the portability problems.
You can't even use arrays or [[ ... ]] and be portable, right? It
might be easier to install bash on whatever it is at that point.
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, (continued)
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/10/17
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Zachary Santer, 2024/10/20
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Grisha Levit, 2024/10/20
- posix vs default mode nonsense, Zachary Santer, 2024/10/21
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Chet Ramey, 2024/10/21
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Zachary Santer, 2024/10/21
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/10/21
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Zachary Santer, 2024/10/21
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Chet Ramey, 2024/10/22
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense,
Zachary Santer <=
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Chet Ramey, 2024/10/26
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Robert Elz, 2024/10/21
- Re: posix vs default mode nonsense, Chet Ramey, 2024/10/21
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/10/20
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/10/21